VJForums  

Go Back   VJForums > Technique > Software

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11th February 2012, 01:24 PM
madsmeskalin's Avatar
madsmeskalin madsmeskalin is offline
Torkonfoslak
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Oslo
Posts: 667
Send a message via Skype™ to madsmeskalin
Default Future of Modul8

First of all: I know you guys dont have answers to this, but I want to hear the thoughts of somebody who has more experience than me.

Ive been using Modul8 since 2009, being the only interface that made sense to me. I tried Resolume back then, but it didnt really give me a hard-on. But lately Resolume seems to catch up, and go beyond. When I was playing with Resolume, the quality of my compositions went up a notch. It was easier to make good transitions, and the effects seemed a little more mature than Modul8īs. The DXV codec is a selling point in itself.

As it havent been a major update for quite some time, what do you guys think we will see from Garagecube in the future? Are Resolume a more stable company, with more resources for development, or do you think Garagecube will surprise us "apple-style" with something big in the near future?
__________________
www.madsmeskalin.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12th February 2012, 11:01 AM
MoRpH's Avatar
MoRpH MoRpH is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 3,672
Send a message via ICQ to MoRpH Send a message via AIM to MoRpH Send a message via MSN to MoRpH Send a message via Yahoo to MoRpH
Default

I agree it has been rather stagnant, hoping for new focus on it now they are done with MadMapper
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12th February 2012, 11:24 AM
sleepytom's Avatar
sleepytom sleepytom is offline
<<<< Muppet!
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 12,888
Default

Does it matter?

Work on better content, the "live" aspect of VJing is massively over rated.

With good content you can do a good show with almost any VJ software.
__________________
Putting the cross into crossplatform

www.vjstore.org Free Clips!! AVHire.net Equipment Rental for VJs by VJs
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12th February 2012, 11:27 AM
MoRpH's Avatar
MoRpH MoRpH is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 3,672
Send a message via ICQ to MoRpH Send a message via AIM to MoRpH Send a message via MSN to MoRpH Send a message via Yahoo to MoRpH
Default

That is true Tom, I couldn't agree more, and thats what I've personally been doing for along time now. That said I would like to see all the VJ softwares continue to evolve, new functionality can open new creative doors
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12th February 2012, 04:38 PM
vanakaru vanakaru is offline
I've given money to VJForums
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ESTONIA
Posts: 1,035
Default

I have been even Modul8 fanboy not so long ago. I like it still and use it on every show but I am a bit disillusioned about its future. There are many things with Modul8 that have been asked to address for YEARS and have been kind of ignored or brushed aside by developers. Sometimes just a good explanation and reasoning would suffice, but it has not happened.
For me the main issues are MIDI (and why not OSC) proper implementation. There is an improvement with abilities saving MIDI maps and choosing devices but why they did not go the whole way. It was discussed a lot.
Then the darkness about preview and output sizes that has not been completely explained is just baffling. Why there has to be such a mess with preview window and ”normalizing” and Advanced Output when we use clips sizes anything but 640x480 is beyond me. So many years and so many questions asked!!??
And thing that has beed requested for some time to be able to lock a layer - result is silence, not even a comment.
Anyway I am sad that I did not choose VDMX when I started. Or jumped to Resolume when they really got going recently. Maybe?
On the positive side M8 have given me the best performance so far. Latest test with MXO2 live capture Modul8 performed absolutely the best. 1-2 frames latency while Quicktime had 5-7, so did many other apps I tested.
And I agree with Tom as well. I would like M8 to be good and well functioning player with the features it has. But it must work solid.

Last edited by vanakaru; 12th February 2012 at 04:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12th February 2012, 06:28 PM
thomase's Avatar
thomase thomase is offline
VJ Wunderkind
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,634
Send a message via ICQ to thomase Send a message via Skype™ to thomase
Default

I totally agree with Tom. Good content and even QT is a good vj app
__________________
Making new loops for http://vjloops.com/
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12th February 2012, 06:40 PM
lotech's Avatar
lotech lotech is offline
video junkies
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 326
Default

The Garagecube guys often counter our requests with 'that can be done with a module' but that just makes me want to smash my head against the wall. It would be fine if they had improved the module editor and included more keywords for us to use in the modules.

I don't even think the app needs to change much, I like the way it works but filling my screen with modules to add basic functionality is a pain.

I have tried to add a bunch of the features I want in to a few modules but would rather have them in the main UI (as my coding skills are terrible).
Things that should just be there now -
Layer lock.
Basic layer playback controls (play/pause/rewind).
Thumbnails of layers.
Less flakey MIDI/OSC.
BPM module built in.
Cross fader controls.
Preview/output/advanced output setup.
Media management - merging/moving/media panel size.

Theres obviously more things but these things should be in there - and 2 years ago.

Last edited by lotech; 12th February 2012 at 06:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12th February 2012, 07:56 PM
deepvisual's Avatar
deepvisual deepvisual is offline
visually challenged
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 6,712
Default

I dunno what the fuss is about.

its stable - unlike all the others
it runs very well if you dont overload it.

thats all I need.
__________________
www.deepvisual.com

Life is around you and in you
Let the sunshine in...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 13th February 2012, 01:10 AM
sleepytom's Avatar
sleepytom sleepytom is offline
<<<< Muppet!
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 12,888
Default

I've never been able to use Modul8 because of the way it fudges output size / layer size. It's not really an issue for some people but I simply cannot use an app that won't tell me what size the output and layers really are.

I also find the GUI is a bit of a train crash! So I'd love it if they would update the application and fix these things.
__________________
Putting the cross into crossplatform

www.vjstore.org Free Clips!! AVHire.net Equipment Rental for VJs by VJs
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 13th February 2012, 01:10 AM
sleepytom's Avatar
sleepytom sleepytom is offline
<<<< Muppet!
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 12,888
Default

I've never been able to use Modul8 because of the way it fudges output size / layer size. It's not really an issue for some people but I simply cannot use an app that won't tell me what size the output and layers really are.

I also find the GUI is a bit of a train crash! So I'd love it if they would update the application and fix these things.
__________________
Putting the cross into crossplatform

www.vjstore.org Free Clips!! AVHire.net Equipment Rental for VJs by VJs
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger